The next level.... Being in Saskatchewan, we'd look across to the U.S. and into Montana, North Dakota, and South Dakota. When we were doing our lockdowns, we were watching what was going on there. We were saying, “Okay, their science is saying something totally different than our science.”
We see even today that the ArriveCAN app was finally taken away. I do want to know what your involvement was in the creation of that app. That's one question.
We still have differentials in North America on what is allowed and whether people who are vaccinated, or not vaccinated, can cross the border. For example, anybody can come into Canada now, but going to the U.S. if you're not vaccinated.... I hear different stories. If you're at the border, a lot of the border officers will ask you, but some of them won't. It is different.
That difference creates confusion, so what is the communication between us and the U.S., for example, in this scenario? What is the recognition of science from other areas, as we go into making our decisions?
When you make that decision, I assume you make recommendations to the Prime Minister, and he makes the decision. How do you square things when the Prime Minister goes to a committee that isn't made up of science to make the final decision over what you recommended?