All right. Monsieur Garon has proposed that we, on Thursday in camera, discuss witnesses, that we commit now to holding two two-hour meetings on Monday in advance of the 7:00 p.m. meeting where we're able to go to clause-by-clause, and that any additional time that may be required is something that we will leave to decide at our Thursday meeting.
Mrs. Goodridge has suggested that the Thursday meeting where we go in camera to discuss witnesses take place tomorrow.
Those are the two proposals in front of you. Again, I don't think they're necessarily entirely inconsistent. Are there any interventions? I see none. I'm going to put both of them to you in the form of a question.
Is it the will of the committee to schedule an in camera meeting tomorrow to discuss witnesses?
(Motion negatived)
We will not be meeting tomorrow. We will be meeting on Thursday at our regular time, in camera, to discuss witnesses, and also to discuss what additional time needs to be allocated over and above the four hours on Monday.
Okay, I just said that as if it's a done deal.