I think we need to come to an understanding on what exactly we're deciding if we vote in favour of this motion. We need to clarify if it's just to say, yes, we agree to study it at some point, but it's not necessarily the next study after we conclude the study on child health. I'm like Mr. van Koeverden. I'm not saying this isn't something that I would want to study at some point, but I'm not sure it would be something that should be studied third, given the priorities that we have.
I also think it's important to be very clear-headed on the number of meetings we have. When we say six meetings and six meetings, we're talking about six meetings of witnesses, if I'm not mistaken. I wanted to clarify that. It's always hard when I don't have the actual text in front of me, but I think we agreed—maybe I could have a nod, Mr. Chair, from you or from the clerk—that it's six meetings of witnesses for each of the two studies we just passed.