One thousand per cent I agree that we need to have those trends, and I could not agree with you more with respect to the importance of monitoring those and that this is one factor. We have a healthy living strategy. We have a healthy eating strategy. Absolutely even dietary preferences and scope are...it's multifactorial.
I think the issue on the amendment specifically is the wording that talks about seeing if proposed sections 7.1 and 7.2 “have been effective having regard to” these rates. What we're saying is that in this time period there is no way to be making that determination that this intervention specifically could show effectiveness on those rates because of, as you said, the nature of these diseases or how long these take to develop. It gets even more complicated in children, because children zero to 13 are not one homogeneous group. They each have different developmental stages. They have different parameters. When you're studying that, those groups are even smaller, so then it gets down to statistics. How much would you have to see in this group to be able to demonstrate that there's a difference? That's the thing.
I don't at all want to give the impression that we do not want to be doing all the monitoring in terms of children's health. That's absolutely the case. It's just the ability of this provision to show the effectiveness of this intervention is not possible in this time frame.