Thank you, Mr. Chair, and welcome to our witnesses.
Thank you, Dr. Sharma. I know you had an international commitment and you changed that on short notice. This shows commitment to the topic at hand and respect for our committee, as well as care for Canadians and their safety. I thank you for that.
A lot of conversation is being had around cost recovery and portrayal of cost recovery as a tax, not only on small businesses but also, ultimately causing an increase in the price. Therefore, it's another level of tax on the consumer during this inflationary time.
I would like to submit that I see cost recovery as implementation of the regulation, empowering Health Canada to ensure that the products being consumed more and more by all Canadians are safe products. I see cost recovery as actually ensuring the safety of the products and Canadians. When cost recovery comes into effect in April 2025, the burden of that cost is with the taxpayers regardless. Health Canada has to go through all of these regulations to ensure that people are kept safe—whether it comes out of taxpayer money from another bucket or through implementing these fees. As you mentioned, not all of the fees are being taken into account.
I understand there were two pilot inspection programs that the department did. The results are very interesting.
I would like you, for the next three and a half minutes, to spend some time explaining those two pilot programs and how they support us in ensuring safety through what is called cost recovery, and ensuring that Health Canada is empowered to ensure the safety of the product and Canadians.
Thank you.