That's what I thought, but I wanted to clarify it.
This points to the Liberal government's lack of oversight and accountability, potentially incentivizing abuse, providing inflated bill amounts and prioritizing IFHP patients, while claimants could stall their own process to extend their stay and eligibility. As a result, bogus asylum claims could receive superior health care through the supplementary coverage—like physiotherapy, home care, counselling and many other health services that taxpaying Canadians and seniors don't even receive.
In your analysis, did you observe any accountability or oversight measures to ensure that bogus asylum claimants would not be abusing this program?