I don't want to derail the proceedings. I'm hugely supportive of this bill. I want this bill to sail through this process or as the regulations are devised, if it's by your office or wherever. I just want that recognition that, if you donate blood for decades, you're still not incurring the material risk of physical death that my colleague incurred and that my father incurred when they donated an organ. It seems incorrect to me to put those two....
By all means, donating blood is important, and it's nice, but it doesn't really incur the same sort of sacrifice. It's unclear to me why they would incur the same sort of reward. I have nothing further to say on the topic. I believe the amendment will pass on division, but I wanted to have that on the record.
Thanks.