I find it, actually, very disrespectful towards the chair and the committee. You haven't even ruled on anything, yet the members started challenging. I think I heard explanations. If we're not even allowed to debate motions or amendments, then this is extremely undemocratic. I think members here deserve the opportunity to move amendments overall, so I find this process, what's happening here, really unsavoury.
I would like to clarify what the process is. If members of the opposition keep challenging every single point made by the chair, I find it unproductive to what we're trying to do here.