Chair, I know many of my colleagues at this table, particularly on the Liberal side, are physicians. I know they work, as I do, in critical environments. They understand that open lines of communication are really important, and that transparency and accountability are really important.
If Dr. Eyolfson thinks we already agreed to bring the minister, and that Andrew Scheer was promulgating misinformation, I don't know why he wouldn't hesitate to say that now. I don't see how the business of the committee can go forward if we can't even agree on what has happened so far regarding summoning the minister.
Maybe the clerk wants to speak to it.
Dr. Eyolfson is very talkative on Twitter. He said they agreed to bring the minister. Later, he said they agreed to investigate PrescribeIT, but we saw what happened with my subamendment just now. I actually agree with the last part of his post. Facts matter.
Is the minister coming? Will there be an investigation on PrescribeIT? Will the minister be speaking to PrescribeIT if she comes as part of this amendment?
We need to know what—