I'm sorry. I thought I asked some pretty specific questions of Ms. Chi about her comments, which I thought were really interesting, and I wanted to hear more about them. I guess she's not interested in explaining what she said.
On the broader motion at hand, I'm still totally confused about what the scheduling is going to be like. I'm not sure if this question is best put to the clerk or to Mr. Eyolfson. Is it her intention or is it his intention? Which is the intention that matters as to when this HIV study will begin?