The House has the ability to have provisions that relate to obviously inside the chamber, but also we have the right to have codes that address issues in the precinct as well. We also have provisions that relate to the rights of members if it involves having....
It seems to me that the Speaker has ruled in the past over issues that relate to things that are said in people's householders, or the inability to get to a vote on time because of some other provision on the precinct. So it seems that the House has ruled in some of these cases that may or may not involve harassment.
How does that differ from what you just talked about? It seems to me that the Speaker has ruled in the past. There has been a parliamentary prima facie case of—maybe not harassment—what could be defined as harassment when something gets said in a householder that somebody doesn't like.