Thank you.
I think it is this issue of the whips that is upsetting people. I think the issue is for people to enter into a process where at the beginning they're seeking advice as to describing what happened and finding out whether it's mediation, restorative justice, or what other possible avenues are open. I think what some people have said is that if there's a trusted female who is identified as being the person, you go with that, and somehow people are more likely to report and then hopefully have it settled.
Can you see that there would be a place where it would have to come to the House if it seemed that the recommendation was that this person should no longer serve? That's really what we do. Our job is to say this isn't in keeping, as though they had been found guilty of an offence. Is there a way of setting some possible disciplinary levels, so that only certain ones have to come back to the House?
I've forgotten my other one. Anyway, answer that and I'll remember what the other thing was.