I'm predisposed, because of some of the new information here, to have some support for this. Excuse me for having missed several meetings, so maybe everybody else knows this, but it doesn't strike me that this is reviewed with much regularity. So I would be willing to do this if somewhere in this report we make a recommendation about when this whole act would be reviewed, so if for some reason designating them as an essential service ends up being something we didn't expect, there would be a point in time when it would be reviewed.
On June 14th, 2006. See this statement in context.