Thank you very much, Mr. Chair.
There should be a correction on line 4. I believe it should be “voter info card” again, as opposed to “ID”.
Also, one of the reasons I think we're running into this potential fraud--and I think Mr. Hill hit it right on the nose--is that there's no process. It seems to me that one of the most important things you do in a democratic nation is vote. We haven't talked about what is not acceptable. For instance, is a magazine label proper identification? It seems to me that should be totally outlawed, but right now it is acceptable. We haven't talked about that.
It seems to me that with the photo ID you will probably resolve about 70% of the issues. That is the first question you asked, and it is a fundamental question. That's the first thing you do. But what is step two? What is a secondary acceptable piece of identification? It's not a magazine label. So we should have that as well, and maybe a step three.
If you don't meet these three requirements, you don't vote. At one point we have to be serious about this, and I don't think we're there yet. I don't think a magazine label is an acceptable piece of identification, and right now it's accepted. We haven't dealt with that.