On a point of order, given that the chair has ruled, I believe anything pertaining to the chair's decision can only be a challenge to that decision, with no debate. My understanding of the rules is that if the chair has ruled on an issue, there is no debate on that ruling. The only procedure that can take place is that a member of the committee, if he or she so wishes, may contest that ruling by challenging it, period. The member may put in a motion right now that he or she challenges the chair's ruling, and there's an immediate vote—
On October 17th, 2006. See this statement in context.