Order.
In fact, Monsieur Guimond asked me to make a decision as to whether or not the amendment was procedurally accurate. I have done the research on it and have consulted with the staff, and I have indeed made a ruling.
Madam Jennings is correct. My ruling is not open for debate. However, a member of the committee can challenge my ruling, can ask for an appeal. That question will be put forward to the committee. If the committee chooses to overrule me, then we will consider the amendment as if it were in fact procedurally correct. If the committee supports the chair's ruling, then we obviously proceed.
There is one option for the committee, as Madam Jennings has pointed out, and that is to appeal my ruling. That would require a motion to challenge it, and there's no debate on it. We just put a motion on the floor to challenge my ruling, and then we take a vote on it.
Mr. Hill, if you would like to do that, I'm open to accepting that motion. No? Then what I would recommend is that we continue debate on the main motion.
Mr. Lukiwski, you have the floor.