Let me just refer to my clerk to get that answer. I think I know the answer to it, but let's double-check.
I accept Mr. Proulx's comment, and I have discussed it with the clerk. It seems we're breaking some new ground here.
My ruling will be to accept Mr. Proulx's argument that because Mr. Lukiwski began his speech after the subamendment, which has now been ruled out of order, the floor must in fact be taken from Mr. Lukiwski and be given to the next speaker on the list.
I will remind members that debate will not close until everybody has spoken to it.
Next on the list is Mr. Proulx. If there's another point of order...Mr. Guimond had his hand up on a point of order, mais perhaps you're satisfied now.
Mr. Lukiwski, I saw your hand go up.
Mr. Guimond.