I think that was just about the end of it anyway, thankfully.
Out of respect for my good friend Monsieur Godin, I will say that presumably they'll not be in government in the near future, anyway, so they're not going to be presented with that challenge--and it is a challenge. Obviously all of us, ideally, want to be as consistent as possible. I would agree with Monsieur Guimond that when we're not consistent, the general electorate often picks up on it and points it out to us, as they should, so when we do have a change in position, we have to be able to defend it.
Anyway, I think the amendment I've proposed is reasonable, and I would support that. If it's defeated--and it appears as though it may be--then we'll revert back to the original motion. And I stand by my statement that I will be voting against the original motion, not because I'm opposed to these provisional standing orders, but for the two reasons I outlined earlier.