Mr. Guimond did not demonstrate that this week with this whip, however.
We can play politics, we can deal blows. That is why we have different political parties, to demonstrate our convictions. They can do the same on their side. If we look to review procedures or similar material, I think it is important to show some openness. We have just finished talking for an hour and a half about the code of ethics with a view to making corrections, if need be. I think Mr. Hill's amendment is reasonable. He is suggesting that we adopt it while at the same time meeting members half way by proposing an amendment that will allow us to verify certain things. I am not convinced that a five- or ten-day notice is the problem, however if there are any technical problems — and I want to be clear that I am not convinced of that — then a meeting would provide an opportunity to make any corrections. I think that if there are any problems anywhere it is our responsibility to correct them. Above all, it is our duty to demonstrate openness between political parties and to listen to and respect each other. If there are no problems, we will make a decision. Mr. Hill's motion is clear: there has to be unanimity among the four parties in order for a change to be made.
Therefore, I will give the process and democracy a chance and I will support the amendment.