I was going to say that we need to see the evidence, but you're saying you don't have it. When the committee obviously gets into the debate, we're going to have to address this. If we're dealing with a mythical problem yet we're using a sledgehammer to address it in terms of potentially disenfranchising a huge number of people, that would be a very serious concern for us, and I hope other members would share that concern too.
This is a pretty fundamental right that we're talking about. If someone is entitled to vote—i.e., they're a citizen and they're 18 years of age—but we remove that right or diminish it because of the rule we've set up, then I already have lawyers who are saying they believe this would be worthy of a challenge legally, from what they've seen already.
So I'm just saying it's going to be an issue, and we would need to look at that very carefully.