That's what I'm getting at. And I would just couch it, in my words, a little differently and say that the leadership is supporting the authority of the chair--not necessarily the action the chair took in the particular circumstances, but the authority the House has vested in the Speaker in order to maintain decorum and dignity. And that's the fundamental issue.
In the Ouellet case of 1977--if you read Jim Jerome's memoirs--in that long pause, I think he says he was drafting his letter of resignation. If MacEachen, the government House leader, had not risen to support the chair, he would have had no choice but to resign the next day.
So I make that point that as a leadership, you're supporting the authority of the chair. The word used becomes almost--I won't say irrelevant, but secondary in the contest between the Speaker and the member.