Thank you, Mr. Chair.
I'm going to start with a question to Mr. Hepburn, and then I'd like to go to Mr. Nothing.
I mention this in advance, Mr. Hepburn, so you'll understand that if I have to cut you off a little bit, it's because I want to leave time for Mr. Nothing. They only give me seven minutes.
One of the things that occurred to me in reading subclause 143(2) in the draft legislation is that it talks about one piece of ID with a photo of the elector and their name and address, or two pieces of identification establishing the elector's name and address as authorized by the Chief Electoral Officer. One of the questions I think we'll want to ask the Chief Electoral Officer is whether he would interpret this to mean that if I have a piece of ID with my name and my photo, and another piece of ID with my address, it would do. I think people have perhaps been interpreting this restrictively, and we don't know if Mr. Kingsley will have a similarly restrictive interpretation.
My own interpretation, if I were in his position, would be that having someone's student card with their photo and name on it, along with some type of information with their name and address, the two together accomplish the goal. Similarly, having a bus pass with my name and my photo on it, along with something else with my name and my address, together would serve the purpose.
If that is the case—and you can correct me if I'm wrong—I think those two options together would virtually eliminate the problem you're describing. I would be wrong if there were some universities still issuing student IDs without photos on them or, I guess, if there were bus passes without photos.
You can maybe enlighten me as to whether this sort of situation exists any more, or whether these things pretty well universally include photos.