Okay, thank you.
There was an issue that was raised by a witness at our last meeting on Tuesday, and I don't think you've had a chance to examine the transcripts of that meeting, so I'll just describe it. A man named Mr. Nothing, who comes from a very small fly-in aboriginal community in northern Ontario, described a situation with which I'm not personally familiar, but you've administered elections for a long time, so I know you will be familiar with it. Effectively, the address for everybody on reserve is general delivery at the post office. But clearly there's some method you must have for differentiating people. He was expressing concerns about the address component in identification. When he said it, what I thought of was that in rural areas a lot of people do have an actual address, a concession number and a lot number, but in practice it's John Smith at RR 1, Smiths Falls, that kind of thing.
I'm relating this back to the requirement that some demonstration of address be given in the bill. How would you deal with this, or in fact do you have the capacity to deal with this? Is this is a problem?