You approximated 4.5 million electors who would have to produce the two pieces of identification. I understand that's an extrapolation from a smaller experience. With that 4.5 million people, because they're going to have to produce two pieces of identification, does that leave you to assume or suspect that either those people aren't bothering, that they're in that pocket of voters who don't vote and go into that statistic--which is, but for the reason of difficulty, a barrier, rather than simply not caring enough to vote, or complacency--or does the use of those two pieces of identification, without photo identification, lead you to suspect that there may be, or do you know that there is, some segment of fraud in people identifying themselves in that way?
On December 7th, 2006. See this statement in context.