We think it would be essentially a “for greater certainty” clause. As I mentioned, we think this piece of ID is already one of the pieces that are authorized by the bill. This, with the amendment proposed, would make it clear—for greater certainty, in effect—that this is indeed one of those pieces. Technically it already is included; it is a government piece of ID. So we think it is already part of the scheme, but this would provide greater clarify on that point.
On December 12th, 2006. See this statement in context.