I have two quick little points. One is that we're asking the CEO to come back to us with the identification he will be allowing for this bill, and yet we're giving him discretion as to his approval of agencies through which this could happen. I would expect that if this was going to go this way, we would at least need to know the agencies. This is really leaving approval of the agency up to the Chief Electoral Officer.
I'll also mention that our witnesses have said that although this may provide for identification on address, it still doesn't meet the citizenship requirement. The people working in these agencies where the people may be staying do not know whether these people are Canadian citizens or not, and that doesn't meet the requirement.
I have trouble on two heads of this: how we pick the agencies, and whether the information being given by the people who work for those agencies is enough to prove an elector.