Perhaps Mr. Lukiwski could talk about this, but I have some reservations. Do you remember in the last election that people presented as proof of address a postage label from their copies of Chatelaine, L'actualité or Time Magazine? I fear this is opening the door to this type of situation. There is nothing to say these magazines weren't stolen from a mailbox or taken from the entrance of a building.
The goal is commendable. The purpose of Mr. Lukiwski's presentation is to control fraud. We talk about minimizing it, even eliminating it, but how will this wording ensure that postage labels will not be used as proof of address?