Yes, get off the precincts but be close.
Finally, Mr. Chair, I would just suggest that if we take Mr. Godin's recommendations as such, as I mentioned earlier, it could be creating more problems than we currently have. I like the suggestion that the whips, on a fairly regular basis, meet with the Speaker. If we're all concerned that the Speaker is not disciplining members frequently enough, or effectively enough, or stringently enough, then I think that's something the whips should be dealing with at the Speaker level to maybe ensure that the Speaker does his or her job.
Finally, and I don't think the situation would ever come to force but there is a potential, if we take the recommendations of Monsieur Godin and allow the Speaker then to start expelling members, somewhere down the line, since we elect Speakers, you might have a Machiavellian, or conspiratorial, attempt where the plan will be, let's elect a Speaker who will purposely eject someone to make sure that party is short one vote at confidence time. I would like to think that no one would do this, but it's a possibility and I don't think that is in the best interest of anyone, certainly not Canadians.
So for all those reasons, I would suggest that we stick with the current system but make sure that the whips communicate to the Speaker if we collectively feel that he's not enforcing the laws stringently enough, and that they do this on a more frequent basis. We should just leave the situation where it is now.