What I've noticed since we've started to be involved on the international scene is that initially, countries were moving in that direction voluntarily. In other words, they were changing because of the fact that geopolitics were changing. Now what's happening is that more of the situations are stressful. They're brought about by massive change that comes from the outside, to a certain extent, and that is sometimes fomented from the inside. That makes the issue more problematic.
I think--I'm not going to call it the market--the second and third time is where people have to live with their disillusion that democracy did not solve everything after the last election. The last election did not solve everything. Democracy's still not installed. This is where progress will have to be made. Efforts will have focus on helping them to establish systems that are more credible and on reaching out to people to make them understand that democracy is a permanent process; it's not just that particular event.
Without that particular event, you don't have it. But it's more than that. You have to work at it every day. You have to have a free press. You have to have a country that is free of graft among the public servants. You have to have so many things. You have to have a Supreme Court. You have to have a court system that is independent of the legislative and executive branches. You have to have an auditor general who reviews the books and produces reports. All these things come together, and I think this is where more of this will have to be done.
In many cases, they went for the election, and it did well, but it's not sufficient. We saw Haiti having to start over and start over and start over.