It won't take me that long. I have a suggestion and then a question. Then I'll turn it over to my colleague Mr. Lukiwski.
I note that in your remarks you suggest it could be problematic if we changed the Standing Orders to dictate or force an adjournment, even a temporary adjournment, of any committee when there's a division, because what would happen in the future if one party were to use that rule to try to prevent a committee from dealing with something controversial? In your notes you used the example of a quorum call, which obviously wouldn't be that important. In remarking about my earlier intervention, you used the example, “That the member be now heard”.
In drafting the new standing order, to ensure that members are afforded the opportunity to return to the House to vote, could we fashion it something like “for a previously scheduled division”? Then it wouldn't be something spur of the moment that necessitated the committee suspending.