Mr. Chairman, point of order. I want to clarify something that I mentioned earlier.
I gave the example of a witness, in a criminal setting, who accepted to go public with information, when the witness was the victim. In the case I mentioned earlier, Nathalie Simard was the victim, and she publicly disclosed her name. No action was taken against her.
A distinction must be made between a parliamentary committee like ours... When the committee meets in camera, that must be respected. I would not want to suggest otherwise.