Maybe I'm being obtuse on this, but my understanding is that the Speaker had asked for direction.
You reach a point in time where you have the two bills before the House. One has been debated, and you have to go back to the other person and say, “Your name is still here. Do you have another bill you want to discuss?”
I'll ask one more time. The proposed amendment before us moves that process closer to the beginning, and without this, I think it's a fairer system, granted that you have to be drawn and you have to be on the order paper. But currently, determining whether or not a bill is non-votable comes later in the process. So you can have two substantially or roughly similar bills on the order of precedence, and it's not until...I don't know whether it's the first hour of debate or the third hour of debate that you then go back to the person with the second bill and say, “I'm sorry; it is non-votable at this point.”