We attempted not to force committees to suspend their deliberations, if that was what everyone wanted, by adjourning. If the committee wants to adjourn, say at 5:30, as it habitually does, we didn't want the standing order to state specifically "suspend the meeting". We wanted the committee to still have the choice to simply adjourn in accordance with standard practice.
If the committee does not want to adjourn, the chair would simply suspend the meeting so that committee members can go to vote and then return and conclude the meeting one way or another. We did not want the standing orders to force all committees—I'm repeating myself—to suspend their deliberations, if they just wanted to adjourn. Is that clear?