Okay.
Under subsection 25(2) of the code it mentions certain things that may be excluded from these disclosures. I'll simply read paragraph 25(3)(l), which says that the items that can be excluded include:
(l) any other asset, liability or source of income that the Ethics Commissioner determines should not be disclosed because (i) the information is not relevant to the purposes of the Code, or (ii) a departure from the general principle of public disclosure is justified in the circumstances.
At this point, I am encouraging you to consider that particular piece of information as qualifying under the second of those two descriptions I just gave to you. It would be a move in the right direction if you'd be willing to consider that.