Thank you, Mr. Chairman.
I agree with what Mr. Godin just said. Earlier, you talked about new members or at least about training on the procedure to be followed, which new members need. I have been here for just over a year, as has my colleague.
You talked about respecting procedure and the need to ensure clear Standing Orders. In fact, not everything is always very clear with regard to procedure. As a new member, I sit on a committee and I replace colleagues on other committees, as I'm doing here today. I have noted that, quite often, the chairs of each committee do not apply the procedure in the same way.
Mr. Godin suggested that, at the start of each in camera meeting, the chair read a letter reminding members to respect the confidential nature of the meeting. But other than that, there are other things to consider, such as how chairs preside over meetings or the terms used. There isn't necessarily any consistency or uniformity in the way that things are said.
Earlier, an example was given regarding the terms "draft" and "final report". Each committee chair may use different terminology. Add to this the fact that each interpreter can say things differently, without necessarily changing the meaning. I think that before we consider imposing sanctions, we should first ensure uniformity among the committees. I imagine that this should come from this committee.