I'll give you two examples. The one you discussed is up to the police. That certainly is a police matter. But we're talking about members of Parliament who, for example, discuss a draft report from an in camera session.
I know Yvon is not here, but he has been pretty adamant about not releasing in camera information. If someone on the committee said, “That's not right and we need to release this”, and the rest of the committee said, “No, it's an in camera situation”, if that person stood outside the door and gave the information to the press, I think it's beyond proof. The person has just done it. I've given an example that has clearly happened in the past.
If that happens, then what? I'm not looking for us to be the judge and jury; I guess I'm looking for us to be more of the judge. This is about the sanctions, not about our proving it happened or didn't happen.