Mr. Chair, as this is a fairly informal discussion, I wonder if I might comment on the same point.
Mr. Proulx has a good point. I was looking at the English version, and I had a problem with the way it ended. It makes me think they were perhaps trying to say, in the French version, “if the bill passes with this section unamended”.
It's what it should say in the English version as well: Could you provide us with an explanation of Elections Canada’s plan for implementing this provision, should the bill pass with clause 28 unamended?