Right. It raises another point that I'll get to in a little while, when we get to it, because I have another point of Mr. Owen's I also have to talk about to see whether he and I are substantially the same.
I think the relevance of this is clear; the relevance is extremely clear. I mean, I'm not sure we could be more relevant, because we're in fact talking about a subcommittee of this committee. How could we not be relevant if in fact the subcommittee is talking about the committee and the committee's talking about the subcommittee?