Yes. That would be right near “confidence”.
Here we are, in fact, on the S pages, and we're talking about “substantially”. As you'll remember, there are the four criteria for making things non-votable as a piece of private members' legislation. I won't repeat them all. I'll just repeat the one we're dealing with here, and that is:
—bills and motions must not concern questions that are substantially the same as ones already voted on by the House of Commons—
You'll remember my comments from the other day, when I was trying to compare for you the two beautiful candy-apple-red Mustangs sitting in the parking lot. We said that if I had two beautiful Mustang convertibles sitting in the parking lot, and they were sitting side by side, you would at first say, “Those two cars are substantially the same. They're red convertible Mustangs.” I said “Yes, but one had a CD player, and the other had satellite radio.”
But I know my friend here would say to me, “But they're still substantially the same, Joe. They both use gasoline and go down the hill. They're red. They're beautiful cars”—