Yes. The key rule seems to be having wealthy relatives.
At any rate, it strikes me that what effectively is happening is that by equalizing the capacity to get loans for various candidates in an actual race for a seat—you have a female from one party and a male for another party—they're both likely to get enough of a percentage of the vote to get a return of their.... Effectively the playing field would be levelled in a way that has not existed previously, vis-à-vis those candidates in that particular situation—not perhaps all of the situations, but in that one situation.
Would that not be correct?