The purpose of this bill, of course, is to address the issues that were raised by your predecessor in his January 2007 report, in which he said, inter alia:
The loans granted by lenders—who are not in the business of lending, who lend money at non-commercial rates, with terms that are not available to others, or in cases where there is little prospect of reimbursement—may be perceived as a means to influence the political entity to which the funds are provided.
Then we saw a very substantial version of this for a number of the leadership candidates for the Liberal leadership, where the perception could exist.... I'm not suggesting that anything untoward was going on, but it does raise the question of how you propose to administer these.
Are you at this point considering allowing anybody not to engage in a full repayment of those loans, or are you expecting a full repayment at this point?