—rather than “an independent member”, because that clarifies it. I think it makes it clearer.
With regard to the interpretation of the second section in this, Mr. Chairman, in the same way that the Standing Orders operate on a kind of common law basis, it's not said anywhere how the Speaker is to interpret these things. Every precedent we have would have us advising a Speaker that what this would mean is that you're not limited to the one. One would be your baseline, if you will.