To answer the first question with respect to the nomination process, our legislation does not have us play a role in the nomination process, so there are no reporting requirements. There are no financial rules around the nomination process under the Election Finances Act of Ontario.
In terms of the incidence of loans, I apologize; I didn't have enough time to do a lot of research with respect to how many loans and their values. But I can give you a general anecdotal summary of our experience. Certainly as you'd expect, the large parties are the ones who borrow money most consistently from financial institutions. The larger and more active associations would do that as well. Certainly candidates do borrow money in some instances to help finance their campaigns. What we see is a very cyclical nature of the loans, as you'd expect.
As they're heading into a campaign or going through a campaign, parties in particular will borrow money. That will be part of what they use in their campaign spending. Over the course of the subsequent four-year period, those loans will be repaid. When they get to the next event, then they start to build their bank accounts again for the purposes of supporting their campaign activity.
I did look at it quickly before I left, and certainly the size of the loans for the large parties in Ontario at the end of 2006 was dramatically lower than coming out of the 2003 election.