I have two brief points on it.
On one side of the coin there is a distinction between nomination candidates and election candidates, in that the problems of waiting for your nomination papers to be filed don't exist for the nomination candidates.
As a counterpoint, the other distinction for the nomination candidates is that the candidate in the nomination race who is successful may well go almost immediately into the election campaign already carrying some nomination debt and having the people who might lend them money, or support their borrowing money, with their credit tied up in guarantees that are still capped at the $1,100 level for all purposes. At the same time, it would prevent those same supporters from giving them contributions, because the way that subsection 405.5(4) is worded, if you look at the sum total of loans, guarantees, and contributions, when applying to the contribution limit of $1,100 as it presently stands, gets to be very difficult, if you include the nomination contestants, for them to then turn around and go through the same exercise a second time in terms of accumulating credit.