If we decide to have witnesses at 11 o'clock, we must find a timetable.But the nature of my proposition is not to have Mayrand from 10 to 11 o'clock and then decide to have witnesses for the rest of the day and then speak on this motion in October. At 11 o'clock we would have a steering committee meeting and decide whether we need to have witnesses. After some questions or problems that we mention, Mayrand might decide at the end of the meeting that it's a good approach; he could change his mind, and we wouldn't need witnesses. Or Mayrand might decide to continue in the same way and arrive with arguments or a clear case from a section of the law, and we would decide we don't have time and don't need more witnesses, that the final solution could be an amendment to the Elections Act.
Who will present? The Bloc Québécois mentioned that we will introduce a bill when the House starts. If the government decides to present an amendment, maybe we'll discuss it, but at 1:30 we want to continue the discussion on this.