I would like to interject. We massage these things out, and this is actually how this committee works. I think we're getting close to a decision. I would just like to comment before I give you the floor, Mr. Poilievre.
I like the idea, but I have a concern. We can schedule 10 o'clock for a discussion with Mr. Mayrand; that's a done deal. Let's do that. We can decide at the 10 o'clock meeting whether we will meet to further discuss the motion that we have been discussing. My concern is that if there are witnesses, it would get discussed at 1:30 p.m.; if there are no witnesses, then we move the 3:30 meeting up to 1:30 and carry on with this discussion.
I'd like to leave 1:30 open in case there are witnesses, but if there are no witnesses, we can meet at 1:30 to discuss this issue. We can move the 3:30 meeting up. In other words, I would like to schedule a meeting at 10 for a discussion with Mr. Mayrand, a meeting at 11 for the steering committee, a meeting at 1:30 for potential witnesses, and a meeting at 3:30 to continue this. If there are no witnesses, we'll move the 3:30 up to 1:30.
That's got to be the compromise you love.