No. We have a challenge on the ruling here. There's no debate required on that. I'll accept the point of order after we go for a vote.
The chair has been challenged on the ruling that the amendment is in order. I probably should explain that amendments that are substantially the same as other amendments are allowed but not during the same meeting.
The amendment is in order and I've been challenged on that decision.
All those in favour of sustaining the chair's decision will raise their hands.