Once again, it's all about making sure we're not disenfranchising people, particularly those who aren't as well off as others, or seniors, or young people. I think photo ID per se is where we start crossing the line into the area you and we are concerned about.
As long as I think there is some mechanism by which people can swear an oath or be able to do something along those lines that actually.... If they have to show ID and they don't have ID, then the exception is that they can swear an oath. I think that might be the way to do it, because right now they don't need to show ID at all.
If we go to the step of ID and then provide the oath as the backup for the ID, it might be the best way. Then you can also track who had to swear an oath because they didn't have ID, and you can track how many people asked for that particular approach. That would help us, I think, solve any problems that could happen in the future.