On documentation for protecting against fraud, I agree something needs to happen that's a bit better than just saying who you are. I agree with that; I just don't want it to become so onerous that we're actually disenfranchising people. I'm sure we can find ways amongst us to figure it out, but I think we have to be very careful.
Concerning the 100 signatures, it's a bit ridiculous. I don't think anyone finds the process actually makes it easier, better, or more authentic for a particular candidate to be a candidate by virtue of having found 100 people to say it was okay for them to be a candidate. I find that a bit weird and I'd be quite happy to see it go.
On advertising about illegal actions, sure, as often as possible, wherever possible; we're okay on that.
Concerning voting on Sunday, I'd certainly be more open to the voting on Sunday issue, and this despite being an active church-goer, than I would be to creating a national holiday, which was something else that was suggested: that voting day, on a Monday, become a national holiday. I fear that, because what it does is create a long weekend, and people leave. It doesn't exactly provide you with the right incentive. That would be my only comment on it.