Thank you.
I'm happy to hear some of the comments on the use of ID, perhaps photo ID, and I'm with you: I don't want to disenfranchise anyone. I think we're now talking about such a small minority of people without ID that to ask for ID at the polling place may be an easier way to go. I'm happy to see that we're talking about that way.
Someone mentioned the citizenship requirement, which is another one that's been really bothering us, as to how we know. Some of these people are put on the electors' list from their tax return by their inadvertently checking a box when they're not Canadian citizens. Where is the challenge spot for that? As you've mentioned, there's also a great deal of hardship for scrutineers in challenging someone at the poll.
The third part, and I guess where I really want the answer is, this comes down to verifying against a list of electors. I think we can put all these other pieces in place to verify against a list, whether it's photo ID, citizenship proof, or anything else, but how do we make the list better in the first place? It's really coming down to the list's having an error rate greater than anyone would accept in any other way, shape, or form.
You mentioned 840,000 registrations on election day. These are people who wanted to be on the list and weren't there, but how many people aren't on the list in total? Mr. Kingsley admits an error rate, I believe, of 15% from his own surveys, and I would bet it's closer to double. I ask for your views on that.
Here are a couple of other quick ones. For alternative forms of voting, since we brought up Sunday voting, what about online and text voting?